Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(launch, govern) feat: support mode network #120

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Tanya-atatakai
Copy link
Collaborator

@Tanya-atatakai Tanya-atatakai commented Oct 21, 2024

Proposed changes

Support mode network on Govern and Launch. Tested on virtual test nets and forks, but with lots of troubles because of limitations.

  1. Launch - contract creation
Screen.Recording.2024-10-21.at.20.27.19.mov
  1. Launch - nominated contract
    image

  2. Govern - Voting

Screen.Recording.2024-10-21.at.22.19.39.mov

Fixes

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 21, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
launch ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 22, 2024 6:52am
4 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
bond ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 22, 2024 6:52am
govern ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 22, 2024 6:52am
operate ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 22, 2024 6:52am
registry ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 22, 2024 6:52am

@truemiller
Copy link
Collaborator

bit overkill to define new chains with the same chainIds as the origin fork :/
could overwrite the RPCs if on development and that would probably be enough
no biggy though

@Tanya-atatakai
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bit overkill to define new chains with the same chainIds as the origin fork :/
could overwrite the RPCs if on development and that would probably be enough
no biggy though

@truemiller good point actually, will consider changing that. but there's also something I'd like to discuss on our next eng call re this.

@Tanya-atatakai Tanya-atatakai merged commit 8abf6b3 into main Oct 22, 2024
9 checks passed
@Tanya-atatakai Tanya-atatakai deleted the tanya/support-mode branch October 22, 2024 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants